|
[also called Arab Revolt]
| State |
Entry |
Exit |
Combat Forces |
Population |
Losses |
| Britain |
1920 |
1920 |
50000 |
45000000 |
3000 |
| Iraq |
1920 |
1920 |
75000 |
3750000 |
10000 |
Local outbreaks against British rule had occurred even before the news
reached Iraq that the country had been given only mandate status. Upon the death
of an important Shia mujtahid (religious scholar) in early May 1920,
Sunni and Shia ulama temporarily put aside their differences as the memorial
services metamorphosed into political rallies. Ramadan, the Islamic month of
fasting, began later in that month; once again, through nationalistic poetry and
oratory, religious leaders exhorted the people to throw off the bonds of
imperialism. Violent demonstrations and strikes followed the British arrest of
several leaders.
When the news of the mandate reached Iraq in late May, a group of Iraqi
delegates met with Wilson and demanded independence. Wilson dismissed them as a
"handful of ungrateful politicians." Nationalist political activity
was stepped up, and the grand mujtahid of Karbala, Imam Shirazi, and
his son, Mirza Muhammad Riza, began to organize the effort in earnest. Arab
flags were made and distributed, and pamphlets were handed out urging the tribes
to prepare for revolt. Muhammad Riza acted as liaison among insurgents in An
Najaf and in Karbala, and the tribal confederations. Shirazi then issued a fatwa
(religious ruling), pointing out that it was against Islamic law for Muslims to
countenance being ruled by non-Muslims, and he called for a jihad against the
British. By July 1920, Mosul was in rebellion against British rule, and the
insurrection moved south down the Euphrates River valley. The southern tribes,
who cherished their long-held political autonomy, needed little inducement to
join in the fray. They did not cooperate in an organized effort against the
British, however, which limited the effect of the revolt. The country was in a
state of anarchy for three months; the British restored order only with great
difficulty and with the assistance of Royal Air Force bombers. British forces
were obliged to send for reinforcements from India and from Iran.
Ath Thawra al Iraqiyya al Kubra, or The Great Iraqi Revolution (as the 1920
rebellion is called), was a watershed event in contemporary Iraqi history. For
the first time, Sunnis and Shias, tribes and cities, were brought together in a
common effort. In the opinion of Hanna Batatu, author of a seminal work on Iraq,
the building of a nation-state in Iraq depended upon two major factors: the
integration of Shias and Sunnis into the new body politic and the successful
resolution of the age-old conflicts between the tribes and the riverine cities
and among the tribes themselves over the food-producing flatlands of the Tigris
and the Euphrates. The 1920 rebellion brought these groups together, if only
briefly; this constituted an important first step in the long and arduous
process of forging a nation-state out of Iraq's conflict-ridden social
structure.
The 1920 revolt had been very costly to the British in both manpower and
money. Whitehall was under domestic pressure to devise a formula that would
provide the maximum control over Iraq at the least cost to the British taxpayer.
The British replaced the military regime with a provisional Arab government,
assisted by British advisers and answerable to the supreme authority of the high
commissioner for Iraq, Cox. The new administration provided a channel of
communication between the British and the restive population, and it gave Iraqi
leaders an opportunity to prepare for eventual self-government. The provisional
government was aided by the large number of trained Iraqi administrators who
returned home when the French ejected Faisal from Syria. Like earlier Iraqi
governments, however, the provisional government was composed chiefly of Sunni
Arabs; once again the Shias were underrepresented.
At the Cairo Conference of 1921, the British set the parameters for Iraqi
political life that were to continue until the 1958 revolution...
|